Category: Technology

MS Windows 7, 8 or 10: Which is The Best OS For You?

Go fetch yourself a glass of water first, because I bet this argument is definitely going to get ugly later on!

Choosing a particular version of Windows has never been easy. I mean, let’s face it! This is one of the biggest debated topics so far in the history of mankind. People come up with various explanations on what to choose and why, but is that really enough for you? Let’s find out.

The Features:

Let’s start from the bottom of our list. Windows 7 was the successor of Windows Vista, which disappointed the users a lot with its sluggishness which even persisted equally on high end hardware. Speed was considered as the key feature of Windows 7 along with better desktop responsiveness and compatibility capabilities. The search and organization were also boosted with an improved start menu for better experience. Windows 7 was introduced with a unique touch support, which indeed existed only for the latest models of the hardware which had touch compatible screens.

Windows 8, on the other hand came bundled with completely new features such as Windows Live syncing which allowed the users to login from any windows PC with their “LIVE ID” and retrieve their own personalized settings. The dynamic desktop with the further improved search functionality and the fact that you could install multiple apps on it made Windows 8 very popular just after it was released.

Lastly, we will talk about the latest update from Windows –Windows 10. Most of us blindly switched to the newer released version, Windows 10, as soon as it was released. This sounds kind of fair too when we consider the massive aspects of changes that were bundled in this free update. The newer start menu combined with the exquisite user interface, virtual assistant Cortana and the gaming app XBOX have tempted the customers to upgrade to Windows 10. Windows 10 comes power-packed with features that resemble nothing like its predecessors in terms of the experiences it offers.


The benchmark comparisons of all the three versions of Windows give all sorts of mixed results. This means that although Windows 10 has been power-packed with features, you won’t have to pay the price bearing a significant drop in performance. However, Windows 10 turns out to be a little slow on running some applications such as Adobe Photoshop and Google Chrome compared to its preceding versions of Windows. This won’t be of much significance especially if you own current high end hardware with all the power Windows 10 needs.

Final Verdict:

Well, we can’t really decide what shirt you wear to the party, can we? The obvious reason behind this would be our lack of knowledge regarding the theme of the party you are planning to go. The same goes with this argument as well. The choice depends totally on what you wish to do with your computer. If you want a light yet fast Operating system, go for Windows 7. If you think you are not going to miss the start menu and cry about it, go for Windows 8. If you think you can compromise a little on the speed in exchange of the power-packed features that Windows 10 offers, go for it without having any second thoughts at all. After all, all the three versions are as equally reliable as you would want them to be. If you don’t own the high end hardware, it would be better for you to stick with the earlier versions of Windows. One thing is for sure, you can get any of these operating systems from Software King at the lowest price.

Windows has always been a pioneer in the making of some of the best operating systems available in the market. Whether you choose Windows 7, 8 or 10 will certainly depend on your usage patterns and the hardware you own. One thing that comes assured with the windows disc is your satisfaction for which the entire company burns the midnight oil, 24×7.

War of Drones: DJI Vs Yuneec – Know What Should You Go For

With the advent of technology, there has been considerable progress in the meadow of the aviation industry. Right from bulky airliners and commercial passenger airplanes, to the airborne firms which have grown by leaps and bounds to build advanced frameworks and come up with a diverse assortment of private (personal/commercial) airborne solutions or drones as they are being called these days.

A number of remote-controlled contraptions have been developed which can assist in realizing a myriad collection of commercial goals without even breaking a sweat.

Right from taking a selfie to mapping out a factory compound, there has been the advent of a number of utilities associated with this unorthodox and surprisingly fresh and well-received avenue of aviation.

Be it monitoring groundwork roadmap or providing telecommunication services, drones have emerged as the go-to service for many of these seemingly complicated tasks. Many private drone owners/pilots have also begun to offer their services commercially.

This has resulted in the creation of a novel trade which has further given rise to cheap aviation access for consumers. But at the same time, it has also spelled out cut-throat competition for those firms who manufacture these flying machines which are equipped with GPS, cameras as well as communication arrays.

The two major firms in this race, Yuneec and DJI have presented some very interesting models with attractive features.

But at a glance, deciding between the two can be a tad difficult. To address this dilemma, we have provided some insight into the prospect via observations that came to our notice.

On The Basis of Market Repo
While the sense and avoid technology from Yuneec may attract a lot of big time drone aficionados, it should be accepted at the very onset that DJI has been the dominant player in the drone market for a number of years.

Which is More Trustable?
Due to the fact that DJI is the prevailing force in the drone world, it has provided us with a number of trustworthy models. In addition to this, Yuneec is a new entrant, which really raises questions upon its ability and capacity to deliver drone parts, provide satisfactory service and carry out drone repair in an efficient manner.

What about The Cost?
Yuneec is new to the game but that does not translate into any weakness in its first impressions. Yuneec has dynamically priced its products at two-third the prices marked by DJI and has gained market share effectively. This way, it hopes to capture the drone service market slowly and steadily.

Better Camera?
DJI has offered a number of additional cam modes after its initial basic offering via a firmware update. While this adds on to a number of shooting modes for the drone cam, the autonomous features provided by DJI are just not up to the mark in comparison to what Yuneec or even 3D Robotics have on offer. There are also broader chances for improvement with the coming versions, but that is all in the air as of now.

What about Overall tech?
Yuneec has a real advantage in terms of the ‘Sense and Avoid’ tech as it has partnered with Intel on this and has allotted some space to accommodate the Intel RealSense camera. In addition to this, there are a number of secondary features which have been integrated to suit a wide variety of tasks.

Any recent Issue To Be Worried About?
Recently, DJI has faced some issues related to the movement of the camera on the mount and some complaints regarding its customer service. It has also attracted flak for nickel and diming the customers for small accessories and the absence of a hard shell pack, which is all quite conveniently provided as a bundle by Yuneec.

In the end, it is up to you, the consumer, to buy what suits your needs the best. But, these tips would surely help you in making that choice wisely.

IP Address Management: How Has It Evolved Over The Years?

IP addresses are a fundamental part of any DNS commercial network, and corporationsbig and small are overshadowing them faster with more submissions and expedients than ever before. Surpassing the significance of getting a grip on IP addresses can invite disaster.

IP addresses are one of the most precarious assets that need to be administered in any network for the sake of your DNS security. Every networked request and device– from e-mail and internet interconnections to file, data center, storage, and net-connected printers– depends on IP and necessitates address assignment.

This poses a big enough challenge, but it’s becoming an even bigger challenge as new fundamental amenities like DHCP, VoIP, and mobile systems upsurge IP address assignment necessities, demanding a much more robust apportionment, cataloging, and pursuing of addresses.

This is collectively known as IP address management (IPAM). But this came into being through a grueling evolutionary process:

Initially, in 1978, IP was first available in as an Internet Experiment Note (IEN). After more than a few modernizations as IENs, IP transformed into RFC 760 in 1980; and ultimately, the one which is widely utilized today, RFC 791, was distributed in 1981. There was extensive fruition in IP address management in the span of these three years. This progress was not destined to stay restricted.
Therefore, the IP model has continued to change over the years to meet new demands. Some of those deviations were premeditated. Others because discrepancies were detected not too long into their development. Others were the outcomes of new proficiencies. Often, the changes were anend result of attempting to do something else entirely.
By 1989, there was already some misunderstanding regarding the IP prototype. RFC 1122 was printed in an attempt to clarify some of that mess as well as to spread the package instance.
There are a number of other RFCs that presented suggestions on countless precise characteristics of the IP model, and as an outcome of that, to acquire a working knowledge of the IP model, one was required to go through a significant number of RFCs.
One other RFC was developed and it burst out onto the IP scenario in 2004, which is maybe the one that is the nearest in essence to this project. That one-RFC 3819-offered recommendations for link-layer rules and designs on how to diminish the impact on strata above the connection layer.
Hence, it dealt with the service prototype at the end of IP, whereas the contemporary model works with the package model at the top of IP.Through it, many programs and upper-layer conventions have been integrated on top of IP.
Besides the effects that were truly recognized in those RFCs, they made a number of diverse expectations about IP. Those expectations today are not documented in one location. They’re not essentially that accessible. They’re not inevitably thought about when modifications are being added. Increasingly, they are not even true.
The straight forward IP service model nominated in RFC 791 specified that correspondents are able to direct to a location without signaling a priori. Receivers can latch on some line they’ve already acquiredwithout signaling a priori.
Packets can be of diversified shapes and dimensions, and there’s no assurance of consistency, organization, or nonexistence of replication. And that is the model which has been held up as the greatest IP service model for network automation.
Unless you can compute all conceivable submissions that are run, any fluctuations to the resolutions itemized in the file will probably halt some presentations. For those who work on machinery at the conveyance layer or higher, dodge these norms whenever useful, and if you do rest on on any, write them down,for example, in necessities and applicability announcements.

In this way, IP has come a long way in the field of virtualization and found a place in all our lives.

IP address management has been through a lot of complex changes and thanks to the technological advancements, companies like BlueCat have come up with customized business solutions.

Now, being associated with the cloud and being a crucial part of the network security paraphernalia, IP has become the basis of the digital world. And it is here to stay for the foreseeable future.